I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

I found the following URL's helpful - though they don't directly address the question I posed initially.http://www.mtec.or.th/th/research/famd/corro%5Chowmetals.htmhttp://www.corrprev.org.au/Galvanic.htm

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

I think your experience, while I'm sure it's convinced you, was not a definitivetest, unless you set up two systems next to each other, identical in all respectssave for the addition of those brass nipples.Those who are still using dielectric unions thinking they are "protecting" electrichot water heaters should be aware that they are wasting their money, because theinsulating gap in the union is shorted out by the tank's electrical ground (percode) through it's power wiring, and the copper piping (if done to code) which isalso grounded. Those two grounds produce an electrical short right across theinsulating gap of the dielectric unions, rendering them useless for their intendedpurpose.It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the sacrificial anode rodevery couple of years and replacing it when it is badly corroded.I learned this the hard way, because the last time I replaced my electric hot waterheater I went to the trouble of installing a pair of dielectric unions, standing on2-1/2" galvanized nipples screwed into the tank's cold and hot ports. In just oneyear one of the nipples started leaking right through its wall. I pulled thingsapart and found both unions and nipples pretty well clogged with big rust crystals,and badly corroded spots on the inside of the nipple walls.I replumbed everything with copper and copper unions. I think it's better to letthe copper run righ to the tank ports, so that the galvanic currents have a bettershot at working on the sacrificial anode.I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

>It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing >it when it is badly corroded.

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

If you can find any licensed electrician you know who'd agree with your statementthat brass, a metal which is a very good conductor of electricity, could possiblyelectrically isolate two other metal items, then I'll offer a full apology to you.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

>It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing >it when it is badly corroded.

Hey guys, the one common thing to all water heaters regardless of thetype of plumbing and anode rod materials, or the manufacturers, is thewater quality. I've only seen it mentioned what, twice in the wholethread? All water is wet and most of it is clear but that's where thesimilarities between one location and another cease. Unseen differencesin water quality ranges all over the board and you'll find that dictateshow well the plumbing/appliance materials it contacts do in regards totheir service lives.Since the EPA changed the acceptable pH range of potable water in 1991from 6.9-8.5 to 6.5-8.5, most 'city' water has been more acidic. A waterwith pH 6.0 is 10 times more acidic than a water of 7.0 (neutral) pH.That's not the only thing that will shorten heater and plumbing materiallife. Things like bacteria, DO, CO2, chlorides, sulfates and TDS contentplus chlorine etc. all have a negative impact on material life. Also,electrical grounding and grounds do too.Take a look here for more info on water caused corrosion:http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/NaturalWaters/Frames.htmGaryQuality Water Associates

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

MuellerSteamspecialtycheck valve

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipatedresults but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple doesa better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects ofelectrolysis

202479 — Adjust the regulator if necessary. To adjust, loosen the locknut on the adjustment screw, then turn the screw up or down until the water ...

I tried my best not to offend you, but the "technical reasoning" I choked over wasyour statement that:"in my experience a brass nipple does a pretty good job of electrically isolating

I'd like to add my experience to this. I've been a plumber for 30 years,changed many a water heater in my day. Remember when water heaters lasted20+ years? The old John Woods and Bradley WHs seemed to last the longest. Istill have a few customers with them, still going strong; never saw adielectric union on one of them. Do you think they would have lasted anylonger if they had? Isn't it a shame the crap they call WHs now hardly last5, 6, 7 years, with or without dielectric unions.Well enough of that. I, probably like most of us, started using dielectricunions when they became code some time back. I really can't say I've seenany WH's longevity increased by using them. I, like Jeff, found wheninstalling DEUs on steel nipples, an accelerated corrosion took placeattacking the steel nipples. In one case it was galvanized nipples on my ownwater heater. It had been installed about 5 years when I disconnected it toredo the flooring under it. The galvanized nipples where totally corroded onthe inside and just about closed to the point of restriction with rust. Igenerally use dielectric nipples when using dielectric unions, but I was outof them when I installed my water heater. I have since seen this conditionin other WHs.Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

A thermostatic mixing valve is a valve that blends hot water (stored at temperatures high enough to kill bacteria) with cold water to ensure constant, safe ...

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

Theory is great, but theory is tested in practice. Science doesn't discovertruth. The most science can do is come up with a hypothesis that fits for atime. You won't convince plumbers that engineers and architects have allthe answers. We've seen too many so-called "engineered" designs thatweren't worth a damn.MM

MuellerStrainer

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

That's why I was barfing about dielectric unions helping only if there isn't a "sneak path" for electric current to flowaround the insulating gap in those unions.Jeff

I suppose it would work just as well for a galvanized to copper connections asthe material in galvanized or black you're trying to isolate the copper from isiron.Doug

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

> Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is pretty> insignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that had> brass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up or> damage to the copper tubing.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

MuellerIndustries

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

I tried my best not to offend you, but the "technical reasoning" I choked over wasyour statement that:"in my experience a brass nipple does a pretty good job of electrically isolating

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

>It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing >it when it is badly corroded.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

The Manual Backflow Preventer Test Kit. TK 9A consists of a differential pressure gauge with adapted connecting hoses and nipples.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

usually when doing a basement changover and leaving the galv. risersI'd either use a diletric union, a brass ips valve or a min 3" brassnipple. I haven't had any problems over the last 30 years. A simplebrass break between the copper and galv. slows down the reactionenough that will out live the existing galv. pipe that is left.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

>It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing >it when it is badly corroded.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

If you stick the bottom ends of a zinc and a copper rod in a glass jar of saltwater, you won't get much corrosion ifthey're not touching each other, but connect the top ends with a piece of wire (even one a hundred feet long) and watch howmuch faster the zinc corrodes.Remember the old zinc/carbon flashlight batteries, and how they'd leak and ruin your flashlight if you discharged them toomuch? That happened because the zinc shell got eaten through by the galvanic corrosion which took place when you connectedthe carbon to the zinc through the flashlight bulb.That's why I was barfing about dielectric unions helping only if there isn't a "sneak path" for electric current to flowaround the insulating gap in those unions.Jeff

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

You've got it right, but what I was trying to say in my OP was that the "contact" doesn't have to be directly between thetwo metals touching each other. The electrolytic corrosion takes place just as badly if they are connected together by someother electrical conductor.If you stick the bottom ends of a zinc and a copper rod in a glass jar of saltwater, you won't get much corrosion ifthey're not touching each other, but connect the top ends with a piece of wire (even one a hundred feet long) and watch howmuch faster the zinc corrodes.Remember the old zinc/carbon flashlight batteries, and how they'd leak and ruin your flashlight if you discharged them toomuch? That happened because the zinc shell got eaten through by the galvanic corrosion which took place when you connectedthe carbon to the zinc through the flashlight bulb.That's why I was barfing about dielectric unions helping only if there isn't a "sneak path" for electric current to flowaround the insulating gap in those unions.Jeff

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

Well enough of that. I, probably like most of us, started using dielectricunions when they became code some time back. I really can't say I've seenany WH's longevity increased by using them. I, like Jeff, found wheninstalling DEUs on steel nipples, an accelerated corrosion took placeattacking the steel nipples. In one case it was galvanized nipples on my ownwater heater. It had been installed about 5 years when I disconnected it toredo the flooring under it. The galvanized nipples where totally corroded onthe inside and just about closed to the point of restriction with rust. Igenerally use dielectric nipples when using dielectric unions, but I was outof them when I installed my water heater. I have since seen this conditionin other WHs.Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

A brass nipple will not break the electrical continuity of the path through whichthe galvanic current flows, and will do little at all to retard galvanic corrosionof the dissimilar metals.I think your experience, while I'm sure it's convinced you, was not a definitivetest, unless you set up two systems next to each other, identical in all respectssave for the addition of those brass nipples.Those who are still using dielectric unions thinking they are "protecting" electrichot water heaters should be aware that they are wasting their money, because theinsulating gap in the union is shorted out by the tank's electrical ground (percode) through it's power wiring, and the copper piping (if done to code) which isalso grounded. Those two grounds produce an electrical short right across theinsulating gap of the dielectric unions, rendering them useless for their intendedpurpose.It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the sacrificial anode rodevery couple of years and replacing it when it is badly corroded.I learned this the hard way, because the last time I replaced my electric hot waterheater I went to the trouble of installing a pair of dielectric unions, standing on2-1/2" galvanized nipples screwed into the tank's cold and hot ports. In just oneyear one of the nipples started leaking right through its wall. I pulled thingsapart and found both unions and nipples pretty well clogged with big rust crystals,and badly corroded spots on the inside of the nipple walls.I replumbed everything with copper and copper unions. I think it's better to letthe copper run righ to the tank ports, so that the galvanic currents have a bettershot at working on the sacrificial anode.I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

If you can find any licensed electrician you know who'd agree with your statementthat brass, a metal which is a very good conductor of electricity, could possiblyelectrically isolate two other metal items, then I'll offer a full apology to you.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

I'd like to add my experience to this. I've been a plumber for 30 years,changed many a water heater in my day. Remember when water heaters lasted20+ years? The old John Woods and Bradley WHs seemed to last the longest. Istill have a few customers with them, still going strong; never saw adielectric union on one of them. Do you think they would have lasted anylonger if they had? Isn't it a shame the crap they call WHs now hardly last5, 6, 7 years, with or without dielectric unions.Well enough of that. I, probably like most of us, started using dielectricunions when they became code some time back. I really can't say I've seenany WH's longevity increased by using them. I, like Jeff, found wheninstalling DEUs on steel nipples, an accelerated corrosion took placeattacking the steel nipples. In one case it was galvanized nipples on my ownwater heater. It had been installed about 5 years when I disconnected it toredo the flooring under it. The galvanized nipples where totally corroded onthe inside and just about closed to the point of restriction with rust. Igenerally use dielectric nipples when using dielectric unions, but I was outof them when I installed my water heater. I have since seen this conditionin other WHs.Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

>It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing >it when it is badly corroded.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

26 May 2022 — Floor drain trap seals are one of the most effective ways to reduce the risk of harmful disease transmission in hospitals.

I learned this the hard way, because the last time I replaced my electric hot waterheater I went to the trouble of installing a pair of dielectric unions, standing on2-1/2" galvanized nipples screwed into the tank's cold and hot ports. In just oneyear one of the nipples started leaking right through its wall. I pulled thingsapart and found both unions and nipples pretty well clogged with big rust crystals,and badly corroded spots on the inside of the nipple walls.I replumbed everything with copper and copper unions. I think it's better to letthe copper run righ to the tank ports, so that the galvanic currents have a bettershot at working on the sacrificial anode.I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

You've got it right, but what I was trying to say in my OP was that the "contact" doesn't have to be directly between thetwo metals touching each other. The electrolytic corrosion takes place just as badly if they are connected together by someother electrical conductor.If you stick the bottom ends of a zinc and a copper rod in a glass jar of saltwater, you won't get much corrosion ifthey're not touching each other, but connect the top ends with a piece of wire (even one a hundred feet long) and watch howmuch faster the zinc corrodes.Remember the old zinc/carbon flashlight batteries, and how they'd leak and ruin your flashlight if you discharged them toomuch? That happened because the zinc shell got eaten through by the galvanic corrosion which took place when you connectedthe carbon to the zinc through the flashlight bulb.That's why I was barfing about dielectric unions helping only if there isn't a "sneak path" for electric current to flowaround the insulating gap in those unions.Jeff

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

The OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

202314 — The standard offers advice on the six classification types of TMV valves: ... The Thermostatic Mixing Valve Manufacturers Association (TMVA) ...

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

Take a look here for more info on water caused corrosion:http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/NaturalWaters/Frames.htmGaryQuality Water Associates

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

Theory is great, but theory is tested in practice. Science doesn't discovertruth. The most science can do is come up with a hypothesis that fits for atime. You won't convince plumbers that engineers and architects have allthe answers. We've seen too many so-called "engineered" designs thatweren't worth a damn.MM

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

I agree with Doug that when using galvanized nipples and die-electric unionsthe nipples will quickly fill up with rust. I have come to the conclusionthat for steel tank water heaters on copper pipe the best way is come outwith male adapters and forget about D.E.U.'s.The worst problems I've seen is when running a circulated domestic hot watersystem on galvanized pipe with a COPPER water heater (A.O. Smith Burkay).The hot water piping popped pin holes all over the system. ( 283 bed nursinghome) over a period of twenty years. I would definitely use die-electricswith a Burkay piped to galvanized.

MuellerSteamSpecialty

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

If you can find any licensed electrician you know who'd agree with your statementthat brass, a metal which is a very good conductor of electricity, could possiblyelectrically isolate two other metal items, then I'll offer a full apology to you.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

While it will NOT meet UPC code requirements, in my experience a brass nippledoes a pretty good job of electrically isolating the black tank of a waterheater from copper tubing.I suppose it would work just as well for a galvanized to copper connections asthe material in galvanized or black you're trying to isolate the copper from isiron.Doug

> Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is pretty> insignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that had> brass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up or> damage to the copper tubing.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is prettyinsignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that hadbrass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up ordamage to the copper tubing.Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipatedresults but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple doesa better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects ofelectrolysis

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

> If I understand all of this correctly, the issue is not how well a> pipe conducts but how electrochemically reactive it is when placed in> contact with a pipe of different composition.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

Those who are still using dielectric unions thinking they are "protecting" electrichot water heaters should be aware that they are wasting their money, because theinsulating gap in the union is shorted out by the tank's electrical ground (percode) through it's power wiring, and the copper piping (if done to code) which isalso grounded. Those two grounds produce an electrical short right across theinsulating gap of the dielectric unions, rendering them useless for their intendedpurpose.It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the sacrificial anode rodevery couple of years and replacing it when it is badly corroded.I learned this the hard way, because the last time I replaced my electric hot waterheater I went to the trouble of installing a pair of dielectric unions, standing on2-1/2" galvanized nipples screwed into the tank's cold and hot ports. In just oneyear one of the nipples started leaking right through its wall. I pulled thingsapart and found both unions and nipples pretty well clogged with big rust crystals,and badly corroded spots on the inside of the nipple walls.I replumbed everything with copper and copper unions. I think it's better to letthe copper run righ to the tank ports, so that the galvanic currents have a bettershot at working on the sacrificial anode.I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

MuellerCo

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

Primary Industry Classification:Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing Established:1956 Beginning in New York City as a small specialty manufacturer servicing the valve industry, Mueller Steam Specialty incorporated in 1956 to start manufacturing pipeline strainers. Since then, the company and its product offering have expanded dramatically. The company moved to North Carolina in 1972 and due to its continued growth, moved again in 1992 to a new and larger facility in St. Pauls, North Carolina. There are now over 300,000 square feet of ISO 9001:2008 registered manufacturing space devoted to Mueller’s various product lines. In addition to a full range of pipeline and specialty strainers, the company now manufactures a broad offering of check valves and butterfly valves. Mueller Joins the Watts Family In December 2005, Mueller became a part of the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. family of companies. The resources and support that Watts has added to Mueller have enabled the company to consolidate previous efforts while at the same time plan for future growth and expansion in products and services. Mueller Today - Mueller Steam Specialty is the world’s largest supplier of strainers and the number one provider of specialty products serving the valve industry. While the company has seen many changes, the dedication to quality, service and delivery remains the same. As always, Mueller Steam Specialty brand strainers and valves will continue to be the premier products of their kind in the marketplace. We offer the following: Strainers, Basket Strainers - Duplex, Basket Strainers - Simplex, Tee Strainers: Temporary Strainers, Turbine Meter Strainers, U.L. Fireline Strainers, Y Strainers: Specialty Products Grooved Products, CHEXTER™ Check Valves, Sure Check™ Check Valves, Silent Check Valves, Control Cheks™, Butterfly Valves, Line Blinds, Suction Diffusers. The New Lead Free* Law - On January 4, 2014 the "Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act," more commonly known as the Lead Free law, goes into effect. The new national mandate requires that every pipe, fixture, and fitting used to convey water for potable use contain less than 0.25% of lead by weight. Here at Mueller, we are committed to helping you plan for this transition—so we’ve compiled a comprehensive set of resources at www.WeAreLeadFree.net. Our collection of tools, which includes a product lookup guide, FAQs, videos, and more, is designed to help you successfully handle the Lead Free changeover. Need to locate Lead Free products? We’ve got the answers in our Product Lookup Guide. Lead Free Labels & Identifiers: We know it’s critical to quickly and easily identify Lead Free products and part numbers. Take a look at our website to learn more.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

> Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is pretty> insignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that had> brass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up or> damage to the copper tubing.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

Theory is great, but theory is tested in practice. Science doesn't discovertruth. The most science can do is come up with a hypothesis that fits for atime. You won't convince plumbers that engineers and architects have allthe answers. We've seen too many so-called "engineered" designs thatweren't worth a damn.MM

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

24 Jan 2024 — The official voltage for the USA and Canada is 120 volts, with most electrical goods operating at around 110 volts. · All of North America ...

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

If you can find any licensed electrician you know who'd agree with your statementthat brass, a metal which is a very good conductor of electricity, could possiblyelectrically isolate two other metal items, then I'll offer a full apology to you.

Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

I replumbed everything with copper and copper unions. I think it's better to letthe copper run righ to the tank ports, so that the galvanic currents have a bettershot at working on the sacrificial anode.I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

I agree with Doug that when using galvanized nipples and die-electric unionsthe nipples will quickly fill up with rust. I have come to the conclusionthat for steel tank water heaters on copper pipe the best way is come outwith male adapters and forget about D.E.U.'s.The worst problems I've seen is when running a circulated domestic hot watersystem on galvanized pipe with a COPPER water heater (A.O. Smith Burkay).The hot water piping popped pin holes all over the system. ( 283 bed nursinghome) over a period of twenty years. I would definitely use die-electricswith a Burkay piped to galvanized.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

If you can find any licensed electrician you know who'd agree with your statementthat brass, a metal which is a very good conductor of electricity, could possiblyelectrically isolate two other metal items, then I'll offer a full apology to you.

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

While it will NOT meet UPC code requirements, in my experience a brass nippledoes a pretty good job of electrically isolating the black tank of a waterheater from copper tubing.I suppose it would work just as well for a galvanized to copper connections asthe material in galvanized or black you're trying to isolate the copper from isiron.Doug

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

Well enough of that. I, probably like most of us, started using dielectricunions when they became code some time back. I really can't say I've seenany WH's longevity increased by using them. I, like Jeff, found wheninstalling DEUs on steel nipples, an accelerated corrosion took placeattacking the steel nipples. In one case it was galvanized nipples on my ownwater heater. It had been installed about 5 years when I disconnected it toredo the flooring under it. The galvanized nipples where totally corroded onthe inside and just about closed to the point of restriction with rust. Igenerally use dielectric nipples when using dielectric unions, but I was outof them when I installed my water heater. I have since seen this conditionin other WHs.Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

I didn't give any technical reasoning only what I've observed in over 30 yearsof plumbing service. Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is prettyinsignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that hadbrass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up ordamage to the copper tubing.Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipatedresults but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple doesa better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects ofelectrolysis

I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn'tmention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections fromcopper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, asan example of what I've observed. Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis mystatement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand waterheaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.Doug

> Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is pretty> insignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that had> brass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up or> damage to the copper tubing.

Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

Theory is great, but theory is tested in practice. Science doesn't discovertruth. The most science can do is come up with a hypothesis that fits for atime. You won't convince plumbers that engineers and architects have allthe answers. We've seen too many so-called "engineered" designs thatweren't worth a damn.MM

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

The drain valve and the T&P also dont have a direct connection toground.Galvanic corrosion is most common in copper distribution systemsconnected directly to the steel water heater tank and to the waterservice piping under ground which provides the ground for the circuit.Then the electrician comes along and compounds the problem byconnecting the electrical service ground to the incoming servicepiping.....

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

Theory is great, but theory is tested in practice. Science doesn't discovertruth. The most science can do is come up with a hypothesis that fits for atime. You won't convince plumbers that engineers and architects have allthe answers. We've seen too many so-called "engineered" designs thatweren't worth a damn.MM

> Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is pretty> insignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that had> brass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up or> damage to the copper tubing.

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

Warm Floors Radiant Heating Systems. Warm floors radiant heating is the latest heating solution that is designed to provide you with effective warmth. Now you ...

I didn't give any technical reasoning only what I've observed in over 30 yearsof plumbing service. Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is prettyinsignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that hadbrass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up ordamage to the copper tubing.Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipatedresults but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple doesa better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects ofelectrolysis

The worst problems I've seen is when running a circulated domestic hot watersystem on galvanized pipe with a COPPER water heater (A.O. Smith Burkay).The hot water piping popped pin holes all over the system. ( 283 bed nursinghome) over a period of twenty years. I would definitely use die-electricswith a Burkay piped to galvanized.

MuellerStreamline

>It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing >it when it is badly corroded.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

Our online training program makes the IMF expertise in key macroeconomic and financial issues available anytime, anywhere, and with free access for all.

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

MuellerY strainer catalog pdf

The Series A2C-SC IntelliFlow® Washing Machine Smart Water Shutoff senses your wash- ing machine's current flow and shuts off the water supply if an inlet hose ...

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

>>> Perhaps there's some other magic at work, I don't know, but before you dis my> statement observations and experience, go change a couple thousand water> heaters including gas fired and electric and get back to us.

It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the sacrificial anode rodevery couple of years and replacing it when it is badly corroded.I learned this the hard way, because the last time I replaced my electric hot waterheater I went to the trouble of installing a pair of dielectric unions, standing on2-1/2" galvanized nipples screwed into the tank's cold and hot ports. In just oneyear one of the nipples started leaking right through its wall. I pulled thingsapart and found both unions and nipples pretty well clogged with big rust crystals,and badly corroded spots on the inside of the nipple walls.I replumbed everything with copper and copper unions. I think it's better to letthe copper run righ to the tank ports, so that the galvanic currents have a bettershot at working on the sacrificial anode.I sliced the leaking nipple open. You can see it at:http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/PIPERUST.jpgThe OP's appears to be at UCSF. It might be interesting for him to verify what I'vesaid above with a prof in the chemistry department who is a guro inelectrochemistry, I'm just a flatfooted electrical engineer, not a chemist.Just my .02.Jeff (Who sometimes misses the San Francisco he was born in back in 1936.)PLUMBGURU2 wrote:

I tried my best not to offend you, but the "technical reasoning" I choked over wasyour statement that:"in my experience a brass nipple does a pretty good job of electrically isolating

Hope this goes to the right place; I've been having a little trouble postingin news groups lately.I'd like to add my experience to this. I've been a plumber for 30 years,changed many a water heater in my day. Remember when water heaters lasted20+ years? The old John Woods and Bradley WHs seemed to last the longest. Istill have a few customers with them, still going strong; never saw adielectric union on one of them. Do you think they would have lasted anylonger if they had? Isn't it a shame the crap they call WHs now hardly last5, 6, 7 years, with or without dielectric unions.Well enough of that. I, probably like most of us, started using dielectricunions when they became code some time back. I really can't say I've seenany WH's longevity increased by using them. I, like Jeff, found wheninstalling DEUs on steel nipples, an accelerated corrosion took placeattacking the steel nipples. In one case it was galvanized nipples on my ownwater heater. It had been installed about 5 years when I disconnected it toredo the flooring under it. The galvanized nipples where totally corroded onthe inside and just about closed to the point of restriction with rust. Igenerally use dielectric nipples when using dielectric unions, but I was outof them when I installed my water heater. I have since seen this conditionin other WHs.Rheem Pro series WHs have dielectric nipples preinstalled. They also offeran extended warranty kit which consists of an extra anode rod attached to aพ" dielectric nipple which installs in the hot side tapping. But get this;Rheem gives you a brass, พ" x 1" bushing for WHs with 1" tapings.So, what's up with all of this? Is the key to always use dielectric nippleswith dielectric unions? Is it just as well to connect directly to the WHwhether it's copper, brass or steel? Does it all depend on water andelectrical conditions in a particular house and area?As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

>>> >It is far wiser to spend the money and time checking the> >sacrificial anode rod every couple of years and replacing> >it when it is badly corroded.>> I totally agree with the above statement, however the original question didn't> mention anything about water heaters. I only used water connections from> copper piping to brass nipple to the black tank in a storage water heater, as> an example of what I've observed.

MuellerStrainer 758

>I've heard that a brass nipple can be used to join copper to galvanized>pipe instead of a dielectric union. Is this true?

Since the EPA changed the acceptable pH range of potable water in 1991from 6.9-8.5 to 6.5-8.5, most 'city' water has been more acidic. A waterwith pH 6.0 is 10 times more acidic than a water of 7.0 (neutral) pH.That's not the only thing that will shorten heater and plumbing materiallife. Things like bacteria, DO, CO2, chlorides, sulfates and TDS contentplus chlorine etc. all have a negative impact on material life. Also,electrical grounding and grounds do too.Take a look here for more info on water caused corrosion:http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/NaturalWaters/Frames.htmGaryQuality Water Associates

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

Remember the old zinc/carbon flashlight batteries, and how they'd leak and ruin your flashlight if you discharged them toomuch? That happened because the zinc shell got eaten through by the galvanic corrosion which took place when you connectedthe carbon to the zinc through the flashlight bulb.That's why I was barfing about dielectric unions helping only if there isn't a "sneak path" for electric current to flowaround the insulating gap in those unions.Jeff

We carry the very best brands of circulator pumps in the industry, capable of residential hydronic and larger industrial uses.

> On 11/08/03 Jeff Wisnia jwi...@conversent.net writes in part:>> >I heartily disagree with you on your technical reasoning.>> I didn't give any technical reasoning only what I've observed in over 30 years> of plumbing service.

> Frankly your experience with your one electric water heater is pretty> insignificant compared to the number of water heaters I've changed out that had> brass nipples screwed into the black tank with no significant build-up or> damage to the copper tubing.

If you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

--Jeff Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)"If you can smile when things are going wrong, you've thought of someone to blameit on."

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

Yes, but the OP has since posted that wants to use dielectric unions to separatingold iron plumbing in the walls of his home from new copper in the basement/crawlspace. I maintain that he'll have to bypass those couplings with an electricaljumper to maintain the code required grounding of the pipes and fixtures in thehome. When he does that he'll lose any help those dielectric unions might havegiven him Thge steel parts of those unions and the iron pipe adjacent to them willsuffer from corrosion.

And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

I'm having trouble getting homeowner's insurance (in California) because of the old galvanized plumbing and am told that a 'substantial' replumbing to copper will satisfy the insurance companies. Water heater is in basement so it will go pure copper; house is 1 story high and the galvanized vertical sections left will be about 4 to 5 feet long.And as I asked initially, 'how long does the nipple need to be?'

Absolutely, but the tanks you've changed out were not in *my* basement, where theywere subjected to the water in our town.And, FWIW, I'd gone through two heaters in this house in twenty years prior tousing those dielectric unions when installing the third heater. There was NObuild-up or damage to the copper tubing or fittings at the tank in all that time.Go to the site below and you'll see that, since iron is higher in the galvanicseries than copper or brass, corrosion attacks the iron, not the copper. (Zinc iseven higher in the table than iron, that's why they use zinc anodes, which corrodeand "protect" the iron tank.) You'll also see that brass is right next to copper inthe series, so there shouldn't be much difference if it's used as you described.http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/CDweb/g-html/g002.htmIf you can honestly state that all of the tanks you've changed which had brassnipples between them and copper piping had insignificant buildup or damage to thecopper tubing AND all the ones you've changed in the same town which didn't havebrass nipples had significant buildup or damage to the copper tubing, then I'llapologize to you a second time.

Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple doesa better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects ofelectrolysis

As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on DEUs. As I said earlier, Ihaven't seen where they are making much difference and I haven't seen whereit makes much difference whether it's an electric, gas, or oil fired WH.~C~

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

The "did" was, as I stated, disagreement with what you said, not disrespect of themor you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood that, but a lifetime of experience hasshown me that there's there's probably little I can do to change your mind aboutthat now..Jeff

> Labratory test are all well and good to give an indication of anticipated> results but quite often fields results vary dramatically from lab results.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis

> On 11/08/03 Jeff Wisnia jwi...@conversent.net writes in part:>> >I heartily disagree with you on your technical reasoning.>> I didn't give any technical reasoning only what I've observed in over 30 years> of plumbing service.

> Ask the other plumbers who visit here from time to time if a brass nipple does> a better job than a dielectric union to help control the effects of> electrolysis